|
Post by Eyesore on May 24, 2004 19:54:17 GMT -5
Alright Ethan, bring it. I challenge you to prove to me why Garfield does not suck. And if I win the debate, I get to moderate this section...
EDIT: Ah, crap... okay, if I win, I get to co-mod with Sephiroth, as he will undoubtably be made mod of this section.
EDIT2: Actually, screw it. Just let me prove you wrong, and make Seph the mod.
|
|
|
Post by Ethan Hawkeye on May 25, 2004 21:58:22 GMT -5
www.dent.ucla.edu/patients/cdc/art/garfield.jpgNow tell me that wasn't funny, c'mon, Grafield's a big, fat, orange cat with a sense of humor who likes to kick dogs off of tables, if that's not a good reason then you come up with why he's so bad. www.chilipepper.de/pictures/div/garfield.jpgAnother garfield brilliance, he was and always will be great. If you were to put a poll on it, there would be more GARFIELD KICKS ASS, then garfield sucks. I can bet you on that one.
|
|
|
Post by Eyesore on May 26, 2004 15:59:02 GMT -5
Hmmm. The first one wasn't funny. The second one was kinda funny, just the unexpectedness of the "death pepper" thing. I don't understand why you have such fanatical devotion to things that suck. I'm not going to mention them because then the debate would go off on a tangent, however, I think it's safe to say that Garfield is one of them. Alright, I searched for 'Garfield comic' in the google image search. The very first result was this: Wow Ethan, this is incredible. How much more incredible could it get? I mean, one second Odie is hopping up to him, and the next second he's LICKING HIS FACE OMG!!! This is comedic gold, at least. Humour at it's finest. Jim Davis is taking comedy TO THE EDGE! Okay, I must have had a random spasm of idiocy. Anyways, through my sarcasm I think you could see past the mind-numbing unfunny transparency of this cartoon. If you couldn't, then... well, I'm not sure what I'll do with you. EDIT: Oh, and your whole argument about how "the majority of people don't think it's sucky" is flawed. I mean, the majority of people will say that pop music is better than rock... does that mean they're right? Certainly not. Concede now before you embarass yourself.
|
|
|
Post by Sephiroth on May 26, 2004 16:42:57 GMT -5
Im jumpin in here it seems to me eyesore that you are just getting the stupid garfields on purpose.Why dont you get a funny one there not that hard to find.My theory is that you cannot except being wrong.
|
|
|
Post by tomparkca on May 26, 2004 17:28:19 GMT -5
im not even going there
|
|
|
Post by Ethan Hawkeye on May 26, 2004 17:47:57 GMT -5
So, a real debate comes into play! Garfield kicks ass, but you're right that the majority of people would say pop is better than rock, because the majority of people are girls on crack who wear ties and pms their way around life popping veins 24/7 (Eyesore's sister is really hot by the way)! Yes, you do pick the not funny ones on purpose, because i didn't get that one when I looked it up. And you yourself said that the second one was somewhat funny, let me repeat that word again, F-u-n-n-y. Garfield is more original than say Marmaduke, or Heathcliffe! He sends his annoying cousin to Abu-Dhabi, I didn't even know there was an Abu-Dhabi until I read Garfield(and yes it is a real place), so how cool is that, but I not judging how "Cool" it is because that's a useless word, but anyways, Garfield's still a big, fat, orange, stripped, kick-ass, hilarious, original piece of work.
|
|
|
Post by Sephiroth on May 26, 2004 18:00:44 GMT -5
And if it was so bad why would thay make a show and an upcoming movie on this comical piece of crap as you call it.
|
|
|
Post by tomparkca on May 26, 2004 18:04:51 GMT -5
i dont agree totaly with either of you garfeild isnt shit and it doesnt kick ass (i kick ass) its an ok comic , expecaily if you compare it to other crapy strips like for beter or worse, and henry and all that stupid shit youl find in news papers and stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Sephiroth on May 26, 2004 18:13:22 GMT -5
This is a debate pick a side and ill give you a nice shiny dime if you choose this side.
|
|
|
Post by tomparkca on May 26, 2004 18:31:17 GMT -5
I pick neutral and sephiroth i thought you didnt like garfeild
|
|
|
Post by Eyesore on May 26, 2004 18:33:53 GMT -5
So, a real debate comes into play! Garfield kicks ass, but you're right that the majority of people would say pop is better than rock, because the majority of people are girls on crack who wear ties and pms their way around life popping veins 24/7 (Eyesore's sister is really hot by the way)! Yes, you do pick the not funny ones on purpose, because i didn't get that one when I looked it up. And you yourself said that the second one was somewhat funny, let me repeat that word again, F-u-n-n-y. Garfield is more original than say Marmaduke, or Heathcliffe! He sends his annoying cousin to Abu-Dhabi, I didn't even know there was an Abu-Dhabi until I read Garfield(and yes it is a real place), so how cool is that, but I not judging how "Cool" it is because that's a useless word, but anyways, Garfield's still a big, fat, orange, stripped, kick-ass, hilarious, original piece of work. Wow, that's intelligent. So, I intentionally pick the not funny ones, or accidentally, whichever you prefer? That's interesting. My sister owned the first 34, save for a few (like the second and third one, and a couple others) and gave them to me when she moved out. In my life, I have read them all, and out of ALL OF THE COMICS, I found maybe three jokes that, at this age, I would find amusing. So, out of roughly 30 ENTIRE comics, only three jokes were plausible. I doubt that out of THIRTY comics I conveniently picked out only the non-funny ones.
|
|
|
Post by Sephiroth on May 26, 2004 18:36:24 GMT -5
so thats your opinion but just the same those could have been old comics and as i said before if it was that crappy why would they make a show from it and a movie.
|
|
|
Post by Eyesore on May 26, 2004 18:57:20 GMT -5
Alright Seph, how many comics are there? In total, how many Garfield comic books are there? The ones I have go up to 34; they're not "old" unless there's like 200 comics now... god forbid.
"if it was crappy why make it into a show and movie lol"
because people like it. Stupid, mouth-breathing, antihygienic, tactless, moronic people. Refer to what I said before about pop music compared to good music.
that went deep man be warned i cursed u
|
|
|
Post by tomparkca on May 26, 2004 19:05:16 GMT -5
You can really use "why would they make a movie out of it" as a good excuse.people make movies about stuff no one likes. Like Spy kids they made a first a second. not very much people liked the second one. But Then They did an Evil Thing. They created one on the most dreaded evil movies ever seen.
Spy Kids 3D
The Shitest movie i have ever seen. (note i was forced to watch it and didnt see it on my own free will)
This is proof that people can make shity movies about shity things.
but im not saying Garfeild is shity im saying its not that good.(spy kids is shity)
|
|
|
Post by Eyesore on May 26, 2004 19:13:37 GMT -5
Thank you Tom, that's a good point. I forgot about the monstrosity that is Spy Kids.
|
|